Rodriguez v. Slauson Distribution Center, et al.
Based upon Sully-Miller’s prior work on the roadway, Plaintiff brought forth causes of action for negligence and premises liability against Sully-Miller. However, the scope of Sully-Miller’s work on the roadway did not include any work on the subject driveway where Plaintiff fell, nor did Sully-Miller exercise control over the area where Plaintiff fell. Discovery and depositions supported the same.
A motion for summary judgment was filed on this basis, negating both duty and causation, and the motion was granted today!