CSAA (Subrogee of Zamora) v. Colder Products Company
In response, defendant Colder demonstrated that the couplings were a component part of an overall water filtration system designed by others such that Colder was insulated from liability under the “component part manufacturer defense.” In support of that defense, Colder demonstrated that the subject coupling was manufactured and supplied in accordance with the specifications provided by its customer, the filter system manufacturer and designer, such that Colder was not responsible for the incident and property damage. Further, Colder established that about $20,000 in repairs to the residence was due to the negligence of the contractor, and not to the failure of the filter system, and demonstrated to the satisfaction of the arbitrator that plaintiff’s expert’s opinions were fundamentally flawed, lacked a scientific foundation in evidence and were contradicted by evidence. As a result, the arbitrator found plaintiff’s expert, along with her opinions, to be unpersuasive.
The arbitrator found that plaintiff CSAA failed to establish proof of product defect and failed to establish that Colder caused the incident. In addition, the arbitrator found that the component part manufacturer defense applied. Accordingly, a defense verdict was awarded in favor of colder and judgment entered for Colder in accordance with the arbitrator’s decision.